A recent Chatham House panel discussion “Venezuela, oil and order: What now for regional security after the US seizes Maduro?” tackled the strategic aftershocks of the reported US operation in Caracas and Washington’s subsequent claims about overseeing Venezuela’s political transition and oil-sector recovery.
For Universal Defence and Security Solutions (UDSS), the discussion is directly relevant to our work with government, defence and industry leaders on geopolitical risk, national resilience and strategic decision-making. It also connects to the wider Chatham House ecosystem: General Sir Richard Barrons KCB CBE, UDSS Co-Chair, is a Chatham House Senior Consulting Fellow and a regular commentator on defence, security and geopolitics.
Watch the discussion
You can view the recording here:
Why this matters: five threads UDSS leaders should track
1) Legitimacy, law and the precedent effect
The panel frames the US action not only as a regional crisis, but as a test case for the rules-based order: what becomes “normal” after a high-profile extraterritorial seizure of a head of state? That question matters because it shapes the risk calculus of allies, rivals and non-aligned states alike. Chatham House’s early analysis also highlights the broader strategic signalling at play, including the impact on US credibility and alliance dynamics.
For defence and security leaders, the practical question is: how quickly does this change assumptions about escalation thresholds, deniability, and the use of coercive tools alongside diplomacy and sanctions?
2) How adversaries interpret it: Russia and China
A core theme raised is how the operation will be perceived by adversaries not just as an isolated event, but as evidence of intent and appetite for risk. In the near term, that can harden geopolitical narratives and influence behaviour in other theatres (from information operations to energy diplomacy and proxy dynamics). Chatham House positioned this as a “second-order effects” problem: consequences may show up indirectly, and not only in Latin America.
3) Latin America’s response: pressure, hedging and alignment choices
The panel invites a hard look at regional reactions: neighbours and partners weighing domestic politics, economic exposure, and security concerns. The key strategic point here is that regional stability rarely turns on one actor alone; it turns on how multiple states respond under uncertainty.
For UK and NATO-aligned stakeholders, this matters because regional reactions can shape:
- operational access and basing assumptions (where relevant)
- counter-narcotics and transnational crime cooperation
- migration and humanitarian pressures that spill into allied politics
4) Oil and markets: capacity is not the same as capability
Washington’s stated ambition to restore Venezuela’s oil industry raises immediate questions about feasibility, infrastructure, investment conditions and timelines. Reporting in early February 2026 shows markets already grappling with the practicalities of increased flows, licensing and refinery constraints.
The broader lesson for business and government leaders is familiar: energy outcomes hinge on execution realities maintenance, security, logistics, governance and not simply on reserves in the ground or headline announcements.
5) NATO allies and trust: what “more secure” really means
Chatham House also puts the spotlight on alliance confidence: how NATO partners interpret renewed “expansionist” rhetoric, and whether such moves increase or decrease long-term security.
From a UDSS perspective, this links to a wider pattern we see across theatres: security is not only a function of capability, but of predictability, cohesion, and credible strategy. When those are questioned, partners hedge, planning assumptions shift, and strategic risk rises.
UDSS perspective: decision advantage in an age of strategic shock
Events like these compress timelines for leaders. The hardest part is rarely “what happened” it’s what it changes: the incentives, the constraints, and the range of plausible next moves.
This is precisely where UDSS supports clients:
- clarifying the strategic implications behind fast-moving events
- translating geopolitical disruption into actionable risk and planning assumptions
- helping leadership teams stress-test decisions against credible scenarios
And it’s why discussions hosted by institutions like Chatham House remain valuable: they provide structured analysis of strategic shocks that increasingly define the operating environment.
UDSS will continue to track developments and their implications for regional security, energy risk, and alliance dynamics, including what this may signal for strategic competition beyond the Western hemisphere.
COMMENTS